Computer Science Question

Week-3-paper-analysis:

 

Please read the starbucks case study and choose 3 recommendations & identify how IT could be used as part of implementation of these recommendations. Use 3 peer reviewed research articles with in-text-citations.  Thank you.

 

Read the Starbucks case study (Links to an external site.). This case study uses Porter’s Value Chain and Five Forces models and a SWOT (strengths-weaknesses-opportunities) analysis to develop strategic recommendations. On page 7 of the Starbucks case study there are 10 recommendations. Choose 3 of the recommendations and identify how IT could be used as part of the implementation of that recommendation. Research in the library how other companies have done something similar for each of your 3 recommendations. Your paper should be at least 3 pages, not counting the title and reference pages. The paper must include at least 3 references from peer-reviewed articles in academic journals. Make sure you have in-text citations and a reference page. You can include additional references from websites and books.

Rubric

COT GRAD Paper Rubric

COT GRAD Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Purpose
25 to >23.0 pts

Work stands out as exemplary, is accurately detailed, and reflects the assignment purpose. Paper provides an in-depth, clear, and concise description of the topic.

23 to >21.0 pts

Work is accurately detailed and reflects the assignment purpose. Paper provides a clear and concise description of the topic.

21 to >18.0 pts

Work mostly reflects the assignment purpose. Paper provides adequate support to the topic.

18 to >17.0 pts

Work marginally reflects the assignment purpose. Paper provides only basic support to the topic.

17 to >0 pts

Work does not reflect the assignment purpose. Paper does not address or minimally addresses topic.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking
25 to >23.0 pts

Integrates ideas from several sources and through critical analysis applies the ideas in a new context. Draws compelling new insights based upon the research.

23 to >21.0 pts

Integrates ideas from several sources with some evidence of critical analysis to provide new insight(s).

21 to >18.0 pts

Uses ideas from multiple sources with some integration. Some critical thinking, but minimal new insights.

18 to >17.0 pts

Uses ideas from multiple sources, but the ideas are disjointed and there is little evidence of critical thinking.

17 to >0 pts

Reiterates ideas from limited sources. No evidence of critical thinking.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Support
20 to >18.7 pts

Uses more than required number of scholarly/professional references to support research with excellent, clear, and concise integration

18.7 to >17.4 pts

Uses more than required number of scholarly/professional references to support research with good integration

17.4 to >16.1 pts

Uses required number of scholarly/professional references to support research with good integration

16.1 to >14.8 pts

Uses required number of scholarly/professional references to support research with poor integration

14.8 to >0 pts

Ineffective support and/or documentation of research

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style
10 to >9.4 pts

Well developed paragraphs. Sequencing enhances ideas and meaning. Ideas focused on central theme.

9.4 to >8.7 pts

Individual paragraphs are good. Good flow between paragraphs with adequate structure and sequencing of ideas.

8.7 to >8.0 pts

Paragraphs are adequate, but sequencing and flow between paragraphs is not always logical.

8 to >7.3 pts

Poor sentence sequence within paragraphs making it difficult to understand the intent of the paragraph. Poor flow between paragraphs.

7.3 to >0 pts

Ideas not in logical order. No structure to paragraphs.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpelling, Grammar, Punctuation
10 to >9.4 pts

No spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors are readily apparent

9.4 to >8.7 pts

Paper contains 1 or 2 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors

8.7 to >8.0 pts

Paper contains 3 or 4 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors

8 to >7.3 pts

Paper contains 5 or 6 spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors

7.3 to >0 pts

Paper is riddled with spelling, punctuation, and/or grammatical errors

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style/Formatting
10 to >9.4 pts

No APA errors are readily apparent

9.4 to >8.7 pts

Paper contains 1 or 2 different APA errors regarding formatting, citations, and/or references

8.7 to >8.0 pts

Paper contains 3 or 4 different APA errors regarding formatting, citations, and/or references

8 to >7.3 pts

Paper contains 5 or 6 different APA errors regarding formatting, citations, and/or references

7.3 to >0 pts

Paper is riddled with APA errors

10 pts
Total Points: 100

 

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00
Client Reviews
4.9
Sitejabber
4.6
Trustpilot
4.8
Our Guarantees
100% Confidentiality
Information about customers is confidential and never disclosed to third parties.
Original Writing
We complete all papers from scratch. You can get a plagiarism report.
Timely Delivery
No missed deadlines – 97% of assignments are completed in time.
Money Back
If you're confident that a writer didn't follow your order details, ask for a refund.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00
Power up Your Academic Success with the
Team of Professionals. We’ve Got Your Back.
Power up Your Study Success with Experts We’ve Got Your Back.